AI support under ProofOps control

AI Automationwithout AI authority

A governed implementation model where AI helps security work move faster, while evidence and human review decide what can be claimed.

This route separates AI support, deterministic verification, human authority, proof ceilings, and blocked claims so the model reads like an operator workflow instead of a long report.

AI rolesupport only
Verifierdeterministic
Authorityhuman review
Promotionbounded

Governed AI triage

AI moves faster inside a cage of evidence, verifiers, and review.

01Alert / detection context

source and ATT&CK orientation enter as context

02AI-assisted summary

AI summarizes and organizes; it does not approve

03ATT&CK orientation

mapping guides review without proving live coverage

04Deterministic verifier

controlled checks and contracts own pass/fail

05Claim Firewall

unsupported public wording is blocked or downgraded

06Human review

authority stays with evidence and review

07Bounded output

public wording stays under the proof ceiling

Governed AI Workflow

AI drafts. Verifiers test. Claim Firewall clamps. Human review decides.

The workflow shows where AI helps and where the system stops it. Public wording stays below evidence, proof ceilings, and human review gates.

  1. 01AI Draft
  2. 02Verifier
  3. 03Claim Firewall
  4. 04Human Review
  5. 05Public Wording

Authority boundary

AI support does not become claim authority.

The route keeps AI, deterministic verifiers, human review, and proof ceilings visually separated.

AI support
labor and drafting
Verifier
schema and controlled checks
Human authority
promotion gate
Website
rendering only
AI disposition
not authorized
Analyst disposition
not claimed

Read the model by authority

Reviewer lenses

The page is organized by what each layer can do and what it cannot claim.

Reviewer lens

AI is labor

AI can help draft detections, summarize reviewer context, and organize case packets, but it does not authorize disposition.

  • AI output enters the same artifact intake path.
  • Claim wording is checked against evidence ceilings.
  • AI approval is not claimed.

Claim discipline

Evidence ceiling and blocked claims

Controlled validation

Supported where records exist

Controlled validation remains distinct from runtime and signal proof.

public_safe

false unless approved

Public release safety requires separate evidence and approval.

Human gate

required

Human review sits above AI output and green checks.
Blockedruntime-status overclaim
Blockedruntime-proof overclaim
Blockedsignal-status overclaim
Blockedpublic-safe proof overclaim
Blockedproduction-readiness overclaim
BlockedSOCaaS-readiness overclaim
BlockedSOCaaS-deployment overclaim
Blockedcustomer-deployment overclaim
Blockedautonomous-SOC overclaim
BlockedAI-disposition approval overclaim
Blockedanalyst-disposition approval overclaim
Blockedfinal-authorization overclaim
Blockedcase-closure overclaim

Operator-grade pattern

What transfers

Transfer

Source control

Rule logic, mapping, status metadata, and review history remain auditable.

Transfer

Deterministic gates

Validation packages, schema checks, and claim-boundary scans fail closed.

Transfer

Case structure

Case packets can carry support-only AI fields and blocked action defaults.

Transfer

Human review

Review authority stays visible above CI, AI output, and implementation momentum.

Transfer

Claim ceilings

Public copy remains below the evidence ceiling attached to each artifact.

Transfer

Reviewer routes

Routes help reviewers inspect evidence without turning rendering into proof.